Gujarat Elect. Regul. Commission vs. Century Rayon (A Division Of Century Textiles And Industries Ltd. )
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
6 Aug 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
X Item No.30 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 5466/2013 ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Appellant(s) VERSUS GRID CORP OF ORISSA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 5467/2013 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 6797/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 29/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Anshu Malik,Adv. Mr. Rutwik Panda,Adv. Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan,Adv. Mr. A. V. Rangam,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhishek Upadhyay,Adv.
Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta,Adv. Mr. Abhisar Bairagi,Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Prashanto Sen,Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer,Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv. Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu,Adv. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2015.09.30 14:49:31 SCT Reason: Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv. Mr. Aditya Gaggar,Adv. Mr. O.P. Gaggar,Adv. Item No.30 2
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 5466/2013
Respondent No. 3 has already filed the counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
The office report indicates that the certificate of service of notice sent to the respondent No. 2 has not been received from the concerned Court as yet. A reminder shall be issued.
C.A. No. 5467/2013
Respondent No. 1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The learned counsel for the appellant shall file the statement of case within a period of 45 days and the learned counsel for the
respondents shall file the same within a period of 35 day s
thereafter.
C.A. No. 6797/2013
Respondent Nos. 1 and 7 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The office report indicates that the certificate of service of notice sent to the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 has not been received from the concerned Court as yet. A reminder shall be issued. List again on 14.12.2015.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
MG