The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. K. Savithramma Since Deceased By Her Lrs

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.K. Sikri
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:6 Sept 2016
CNR:SCIN010196062012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

17 Jan 2014

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

REGISTRAR COURT. 1

SECTION IIIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Civil Appeal No(s). 712/2014

C.I.T, BANGALORE & ANR

Appellant(s)

$Respondent(s)$

VERSUS

K.SAVITHRAMMA (D) TR.LRS.

WITH

C.A. No. 713/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 714/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. $715/2014$ Office Report) C.A. No. $716/2014$ Office Report) C.A. No. 717/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 718/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 719/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. $720/2014$ Office Report) C.A. No. 721/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 722/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 723/2014 Signa Cheffeifice Report) Digitally signed by<br>HEMA JOSH<br>Date: 2016.09.07 Reason: $\frac{20}{3}$ $\frac{16.02.23}{3}$ $\frac{15}{3}$ $\frac{16.02.23}{3}$ $\frac{15}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac{17}{3}$ $\frac$ Office Report) C.A. No. 725/2014 Office Report)

ITEM NO.7

Item No.7 C.A. No. 726/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 727/2014 Office Report) C.A. No. 728/2014 Office Report) Date : 06/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Kumar Dushyant Singh, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s)

Ms Shruti Iyer, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Service is complete in all the matters.

Parties have not filed statement. It is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

Last opportunity of two weeks is granted for filing ad valorem Court fee and also for filing statement of case by the parties within the same time, if otherwise statutory period has not expired.

Registry immediately thereafter to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, if court fee is filed. If not filed, let the matters be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(22) - 6 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(23) - 6 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 6 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 6 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 6 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 20 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 13 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 13 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 24 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 24 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 3 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 28 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 28 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 17 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 3 Jan 2014

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 3 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 18 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 31 Aug 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 13 Aug 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 30 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 6 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 3 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 9 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 23 Apr 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 Apr 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 23 Mar 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view