The Executive Engineer vs. Pujeri Vinod Mahadev
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.25
SECTION IV-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 215-216/2023
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-10-2022 in RP No. 328/2021 25-09-2019 in MFA No. 3806/2019 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalurul
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S S.V. GLOBAL MILL LIMITED Respondent(s) IA No. 198725/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 278613/2024 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT WITH $SLP(C)$ No. 23949-23951/2023 (IV-A) IA No. 193168/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 193169/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ 30866/2023 PERMISSION $\mathsf{T}\mathsf{O}$ FILE ADDITIONAL $\mathsf{N}\mathsf{n}$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$ DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES PERMISSION TO $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ 193170/2022 FILE ADDITIONAL $\mathbf{N}$ O. $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$ DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES SLP(C) No. 28469/2023 (XVI) $SLP(C)$ No. 30633/2024 (IV-A) FOR ADMISSION SLP(C) No. 342/2025 (IV-A) FOR ADMISSION SLP(C) No. 685/2025 (IV-A) FOR ADMISSION SLP(C) No. 31094/2024 (IV-A) FOR ADMISSION Signa $\mathbb{R}$ No. 19/2025 (IV-A) Digital $\mathbf{F}$ is need by $\mathbf{A}$ DMISSION<br>SHALL $\mathbf{A}$ DMISSION<br>Date: $2026.02.01$ Date: $202000$ <br>15:34:16 IST SLP(C) No. 31152/2024 (IV-A) FOR ADMISSION
SLP(C) No. 310/2025 (IV-A)
COURT NO.9
FOR ADMISSION SLP(C) No. 249/2025 (IV-A) FOR ADMISSION Date : 28-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aman Panwar, A.A.G. Mr. Naveen Sharma, AOR Mrs. Swati Bhushan Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shivansh Saxena, Adv. Mr. Anuj Sehrawat, Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Aman Panwar, A.A.G. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, A.A.G. Ms. Mythili S, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Naved Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Shivansh Saxena, Adv. Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Adv. Mrs. Mythili S, Adv. Mr. V Shyamohan, Adv. Ms. Anshika Bajpai, Adv. Ms. Vrinda Baheti, Adv. M/S. Kmnp Law Aor, AOR Mr. Rajiv Shakdher, Sr. Adv. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, AOR Mr. Siddarth Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Lalit Mohini Bhat, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv. Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv. Mr. Harpawan Kumar Arora, Adv. Ms. Prashi Tyagi, Adv. M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Mr. Ambarish Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Nangia, Adv. Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikram Hegde, Adv. Mr. Shirish Krishna, Adv. Ms. Hima Lawrence, AOR Mr. Chitwan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Palash Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Bihu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Khusboo Hora, Adv. Ms. Archita Nigam, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Gopal Elker, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the parties.
We have already passed an order to club all the similar matters wherein the same question of law has been raised. The issue is with respect to the period of limitation which is to be applied in the teeth of the proviso to Section 74 of the new Land Acquisition Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 'the New Act') in juxtaposition to Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Old Act').
In other words, for an acquisition to be made under the old Act, the provision of the new Act would be applicable with specific reference to the period of limitation prescribed thereunder. The incidental issue is on the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
3
The letter of the Central Government dated 16.10.2015 also requires a definite interpretation. Additionally, Section 24(1)(a) of the New Act also requires consideration.
As the said issues would involve a substantial implication on revenue, we would like to have the assistance of learned Attorney General for India or learned Additional Solicitor General of India (ASG).
Issue notice to the offices of the learned Attorney General and the learned ASG.
The Registry is directed to furnish copies of the petitions to both the learned Attorney General and learned ASG.
Learned counsel appearing for both parties are directed to serve papers to the office of the learned and Attorney General and learned ASG, after duly informing them of the order passed by us today.
List on 25.02.2025.
In the meantime, pleadings are to be completed.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR