Centre For Development Of Advanced Computing (Cdac) vs. Arun Raj Kumar K. P
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Court 14 (Video Conferencing) ITEM NO.9 SECTION XI-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16354/2019 NAVIN SAMUEL Petitioner(s) VERSUS PREM KRISHNAN N. & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ <pre>IA No. 119592/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre> WITH SLP(C) No. 464/2020 (XI-A) $(FOR)$ FOR impleading party ON IA 118672/2020 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 118672/2020 <pre>IA No. 118672/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre> Date : 18-01-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Dr. Nishesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abraham M. Pattivani, Adv. Mr. Jose Abraham, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Babita Sant, Adv. Ms. Malini Poduval, AOR Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.a., AOR Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR Mr. Krishnamohan K., AOR Ms. Dania Nayyar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following 0 R D F R
P(C) No. 16354/2019 (Item No.9):
Learned counsel for the petitioner oppose the application for
impleadment on the ground that the applicants were not parties in the concerned proceeding before the Central Administrative Tribunal and also in the High Court. Accordingly, two weeks' time is granted, as prayed, to file objections.
SLP(C) No. 464/2020 (Item no.9.1):
Heard learned counsel for the parties. As the applicants were appearing before the Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court, their impleadment in the present proceeding, is allowed. Necessary corrections in the Cause Title should accordingly be made.
(JATINDER KAUR) (R.S. NARAYANAN) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)