Centre For Development Of Advanced Computing (Cdac) vs. Arun Raj Kumar K. P
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Administrative Order
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List before court/bench
Listed On:
11 Feb 2022
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SECTION XI-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16354/2019
NAVIN SAMUEL
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PREM KRISHNAN N. & ORS.
(ONLY SLP(C) NOs. 464 OF 2020 AND SLP(C) NO. 12916 OF 2022 TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE COURT OF LD. REGISTRAR.])
WTTH SLP(C) No. 464/2020 (XI-A) (FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 72428/2022) SLP(C) No. 12916/2022 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.102091/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING <pre>C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)</pre>
Date: 02-11-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr./Ms. Akshara A., Adv.<br>Mr./Ms. A.M. Pattiyani, Adv.<br>Mr. Jose Abraham, AOR | |
---|---|
Mr. Tacho Eru, Adv.<br>Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR | |
Mr. Ruturaj S., Adv.<br>Mr. Abinash B., Adv.<br>Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, AOR | |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.<br>Mr. Desam Sudhakarareddy, Adv.<br>Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR | |
Ms. Dania Nayyar, Adv.<br>Mr. Krishnamohan K., AOR |
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the $\mathbf{m}$ made the following $0 R D E R$
SLP (C) No.464/2020
In respect of Respondent Nos. 6 and 9, service deemed to be complete through e-mail in terms of order dated 25.03.2022, passed
ITEM NO.34
Respondent(s)
by Hon. Judge-in-chambers.
Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 & 8 have filed counter affidavit.
One week time, is granted to Respondent Nos. 10 to 24, to file counter affidavit.
After expiry of said period, matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
SLP (C) No.12916/2022
No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent No.30, despite due service of notice.
Respondent Nos. 1 to 29 have filed counter affidavit.
Accordingly, matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
S.P.S. LALER Registrar
vs