Centre For Development Of Advanced Computing (Cdac) vs. Arun Raj Kumar K. P
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 16354/2019 NAVIN SAMUEL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PREM KRISHNAN N. & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 464/2020 (XI-A)
Date : 07-03-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR |
---|---|
Mr. Abraham M. Pattiyani Adv,<br>Mr. Vikas Adv.<br>Mr. Jose Abraham, AOR | |
For Respondent(s) | |
Ms. Malini Poduval, AOR | |
Ms. Babita Sant,Adv. | |
Ms. Kochurani C. J., Adv | |
Mr. Jaison V. J., Adv | |
Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR | |
Ms. Dania Nayyar, Adv | |
Mr. Krishnamohan K., AOR | |
O R D E R
SLP(C) No. 16354/2019
The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 7 to 9, 16 and 22 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
Respondent Nos. 1 to 6, 10 to 15, 17 to 21, 23 to 25 and 27 have already filed the counter affidavit.
Four weeks time, as last chance is granted to respondent No. 26 to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C) No. 464/2020
The office report indicates that Respondent Nos. 10 to 15 had already submitted that they do not wish to file counter affidavit.
Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 7 and 8 have already filed the counter affidavit.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps for the service of notice to respondent Nos. 6 and 9 despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders. List thereafter.
SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Registrar
MG
2