Harikrishan Bhairavnath Tiwari (Died) Through Lrs vs. Shree Ramakrishna Shikshan Mandal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Krishna Murari, Hon'ble Hima Kohli
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
8 Aug 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6
COURT NO.17
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.13420/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-04-2022 in FA No. 247/2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
HARIKRISHAN BHAIRAVNATH TIWARI (DIED) THROUGH LRS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SHREE RAMAKRISHNA SHIKSHAN MANDAL & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.106866/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.108477/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date: 08-08-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
| For Petitioner(s) Dr. G.V. Rao, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. A.K. Upadhyay, Adv.<br>Mr. G. Arudhra Rao, Adv.<br>Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Amit Paul, Adv.<br>Mr. Sanjeev Tiwari, Adv.<br>Mr. Hari Krishnan, Adv.<br>Mr. B. Tiwari, Adv.<br>Ms. S. Janani, AOR |
|---|
| For Respondent(s) Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Saket Mone, Adv.<br>Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR<br>Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini, Adv.<br>Ms. Priyashree Sharma PH, Adv.<br>Mr. Syed Faraz Alam, Adv.<br>Mr. Subit Chakrabarti, Adv.<br>Mr. Devansh Shah, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Having heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the $\mathbf{1}$
parties, we are of the considered opinion that the impugned order does not warrant any interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
2. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. However, it is left open to the petitioners to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction within a period of eight weeks from today. All contentions by the parties are left open to be raised in the proceedings, if any, initiated before the Court of competent jurisdiction.
4. The Trial Court shall decide the injunction application, if any, on its own merits without being influenced by any of the observations made in these proceedings.
5. Status quo in respect of the possession over the land in dispute shall be maintained by the parties for a period of eight weeks.
(RAJNI MUKHI) (R.S. NARAYANAN)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
2