Saroop Khan (Deceased) Through His Lrs vs. Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8161-8179/2023 OM PARKASH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ WITH SLP(C) No. 14156-14188/2023 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. $14331-14341/2023$ (IV-B) $SLP(C)$ No. 14342-14345/2023 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. 14326-14327/2023 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 11517/2023 (IV-B) 1 $SLP(C)$ No. 11526/2023 (IV-B) IA No. 103479/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 103476/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) SLP(C) No. 11525/2023 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. 11523/2023 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. 11522/2023 (IV-B) ) SLP(C) No. 21998-22029/2023 (IV-B) ) Diary No(s). 42640/2023 (IV-B) Diary No(s). $42610/2023$ (IV-B) ) Date: 05-01-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today. Petitioner(s) Mr. Ritesh Patil, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Pati Raj Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Ms. Malvika Kapila, AOR Mr. Saifuddin Shams, Adv. Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Adv. Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. Mr. N D Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Bharti, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Sandeep Choudhary, AOR Mr. Tahir Hussain, Adv. Ms. Manita Mahlawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Vishnu Tallapragada, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No. 8161-79, 14156-14188, 14331-14341, 11517, 11525/2023, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time, as last opportunity, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondents.
contdā¦.
The respondents for whom vakalatnama has been filed, are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
The respondents who have already been granted one opportunity to file counter affidavit, are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.
Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.
In SLP(C) No. 14331-14341/2023, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an Application for dispensing with service of notice. The same be processed as per rules and listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.