Siddharth vs. State Of U. P. Thru Collector

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A.Nos........In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26256-26257/2011

(From the judgement and order dated 05/10/2006 in CMRA No.45821/1997 in CMWP No.17405/1994 and the judgment and order dt.24.02.2011 in CMRA No.110043/2010 in CMWP No.17405/1994 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)

SIDDHARTH & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. THRU COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for direction/modification)

Date: 30/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

For Petitioner(s) Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Sr.Adv. Mr.Anurag Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)/ Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv. Applicant Mr.A.K.Gupta, Adv. Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Adv.

Mr. Gopal Prasad,Adv. Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Pallav Sisodia, Sr.Adv.

Mr.Anil Gupta, Adv. Mr.Gopal Prasad, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice to the petitioners.

Shri Anurag Sharma, instructing counsel of Shri Ranjit

Kumar, learned senior counsel, accepts notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within two weeks.

2

Rejoinder, if any, be filed within next one week.

List the case in the third week of October, 2011.

In the meanwhile, status quo, as it is obtaining today,

shall be maintained in respect of the property in question. This

would also mean that the applicants shall not be entitled to continue with the construction or alienate the property in question.

Court Master Court Master

(Satish K.Yadav) (Phoolan Wati Arora)