Union Of India vs. Kamlesh Metacast Pvt. Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi, Hon'ble Satish Chandra Sharma
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
Permission to File SLP/Appeal-allowed and matter dismissed(including all pending IAs) [delay condoned]
Listed On:
15 Jul 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
127909/2024,127911/2024,127912/2024,127913/2024,127914/2024,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $48$
COURT NO.14
SECTION XV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.19307/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-01-2022 in DBCSAW No. 754/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur)
UNION OF INDIA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S. KAMLESH METACAST PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 127912/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP, IA No. 127913/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 127914/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., $\texttt{IA}$ No. 127911/2024 $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$ PERMISSION $\mathbf{T}\mathbf{O}$ ${\tt FILE}$ ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES & IA No. 127909/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE SLP)
Date: 15-07-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv.
- Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv.
- Mr. Gauran Bhushan, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv.
- Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv.
- Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR
- Mr. Sameer Rohtagi, Adv.
- Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Application seeking permission to file the Special Leave Petition is granted.
- Delay condoned.
3. The learned Additional Solicitor General submits that the impugned judgment would affect the operation of the provisions of MMDR Act throughout the country and would have widespread ramifications on other cases similarly situated.
4. Learned Senior counsel – Mr. Mukul Rohtagi for the Respondent No.1, however, states that the State of Rajasthan has already accepted the Judgment passed by the High Court and implemented also.
5. In view of the above statement made by the learned Senior counsel, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
6. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
7. However, the question of law involved in this case is kept open.
8. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
(VISHAL ANAND) (MAMTA RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)