Union Of India And Ors (Rep. By Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Kanpur) vs. Raj Automobiles

ITEM NO.8+(23+52)+25 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 19463/2010 (From the judgement and order dated 07/08/2009 in CWP No. 665/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DARA TRADING & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. Respondent(s) With I.A.No.1 (C/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C)No....CC No.338/2011 WITH I.A.1(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP, C/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 387 of 2011 With I.A.No.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 394 of 2011 With I.A.No.1 (C/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in filing SLP and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 457 of 2011 With I.A.No.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report) With S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 897 of 2011 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 854 of 2011 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) WITH SLP(C)NO....CC No.18830 of 2010 WITH I.A.No.1 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date: 17/01/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourab Banerji, ASG Mr. S.A. Haseeb,Adv. Ms. Bhakti Pasricha,Adv. 2 Mr. Gautam Jha,Adv. Ms. Rajni Ohri,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv. In SLP(C)CC18830/10 Mr. Mohan Parasaran,ASG Mr. Aarohi Bhalla, Mr. V. Shekhar,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice regarding delay and SLP.

We find that inspite of our previous orders in other matters arising from the order dated 7.8.2009 and followed cases, even though the matter involves only a pure legal issue, the petitioner continues to file individual special leave petitions of more than 300 pages instead of filing one single batch of SLP with huge delay. The procedure adopted does not help anyone except helping the persons who prepare the paper books. Enormous time is wasted in considering each SLP (With application for condonation of delay) separately.

Finally Tag with SLP(C) No.19990 of 2010 and connected cases.

( O.P. Sharma ) ( M.S. Negi ) Court Master Court Master