The Executive Engineer, Gujarat Electricity Board vs. The New India Assurance Company Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION III
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 23052-23053/2023
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 09-05-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. C.b.gururaj, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR Mr. Animesh Dubey, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Ms. Awantika Manohar, AOR Ms Parul Dhurvey, Adv.
Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, AOR Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C)NO.23052/2023
Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit.
Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3. Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr Udian Sharma undertakes to appear for the said respondents and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks. Digitally signed by HEMA JOSHI Date: 2025.05.09 16:00:42 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Service is complete on respondent nos. 4 and 5 but none has entered appearance.
As per office report, opportunity of respondent no.6 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. However, it has been submitted by the ld. Counsel that counter affidavit has been filed on 27.3.2025. Registry to verify and update the record. If filed be taken on record. Fact that the counter affidavit was filed on the same date, when the opportunity to file the same was declined be mentioned in the office report while placing the matter before the Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C)NO.23053/2023
Respondent nos.1 and 10 have filed counter affidavit.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of unserved respondent no.2.
Service is complete on respondent nos. 3,4 and 7 to 9 but none has entered appearance.
Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr Udian Sharma has submitted that he is not entering appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3 in this matter, as submitted on the last date of hearing. Submission is taken on record.
As per office report, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent nos.5 and 6 despite last opportunity having been granted. However, it has been submitted by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner that an application seeking deletion of the names of
Contd….
respondent nos. 5 and 6 would be moved. Be filed within two weeks. If filed, process the same for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. However, if the same is not filed within the time granted, then too in default of not taking appropriate steps, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.
SUJATA SINGH Registrar
HJ
-3-