Juvenile Dinesh Kumar (Minor) vs. U. T. State, Chandigarh
AI Summary
In a significant procedural decision, the Supreme Court of India has rejected the Special Leave Petition filed by a minor, Juvenile Dinesh Kumar, challenging an order from the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. This dismissal means the petitioner's attempt to appeal the High Court's judgment at the apex court has been unsuccessful, underscoring the high bar for seeking leave to appeal.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
A Special Leave Petition (Criminal) was initiated by Juvenile Dinesh Kumar, a minor, challenging a judgment and order dated August 30, 2001, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Criminal Revision Application No. 957/1999. The petition sought permission to file the SLP and for an ex-parte stay. On May 6, 2002, the Supreme Court heard the matter and rejected the permission to file the special leave petition.
Timeline of Events
Criminal Revision Application No. 957/1999 filed in High Court of Punjab & Haryana.
Judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in CRLR 957/99.
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed in the Supreme Court.
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) registered in the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court heard the petition for permission to file SLP and ex-parte stay.
Primary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioner sought permission from the Supreme Court to file a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) against the impugned High Court order and also requested an ex-parte stay.
Respondent's Arguments
No arguments for the respondent side are recorded as the matter was at the stage of permission to file SLP and was summarily rejected.
Court's Reasoning
The Court's reasoning is not detailed in the order, which merely states, "Permission to file special leave petition is rejected." This indicates that the Bench found no sufficient grounds or exceptional circumstances to grant leave to appeal.
- Strict Adherence to Procedure
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.Permission to file special leave petition is rejected.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This order is a procedural rejection of permission to file a Special Leave Petition and does not lay down any substantive principle of law, therefore having no precedential value.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
8 Apr 2002
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SLP(Crl.)... 3570 OF 2002 ITEM No.24 Court No.11 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Crl. Miscellaneous Petition No. 3570/2002 in & Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Crl.).../2002 (From the judgement and order dated 30/08/2001 in CRLR 957/99 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) JUVENILE DINESH KUMAR (MINOR) Petitioner (s) VERSUS U.T. STATE, CHANDIGARH Respondent (s) ( for permission to file SLP and ex-Parte stay ) Date : 06/05/2002 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.G. BALAKRISHNAN For Petitioner (s)0 Mr.K.M.S.Bedi, Adv. For Respondent (s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.....J. .SP2 Permission to file special leave petition is rejected. .SP1 Anita (V.P. Tyagi) Court Master
V