The State Of Himachal Pradesh Chief Secretary vs. Ravinder Kumar Sankhayan (Dead)

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 Feb 2017
CNR:SCIN010190922005

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

4 Aug 2006

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Listed on : 09.02.2017 Court No. : 1 Item No. :

SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTON

CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3392, 3393 and 3394/2006 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1/2017 (Application for impleadment filed by Mr. Devender Singh Advocate)

State of H. P. ...Appellant Versus Ravinder Kumar Sankhayan & Ors. ...Respondents

OFFICE REPORT

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3392/2006

It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate and Respondent No. 5 is represented by Mr. Naresh Kr. Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 served with notice but not entered appearance.

It is further submitted that Mr. Devender Singh, Advocate has on 07.02.2017 filed an application for impleadment to implead the applicant as party respondent alongwith Vakalatnama/Appearace on behalf of the applicant but he has not served its copy on the counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 5 (Regd. as I.A. No. 1/17) and the same has been placed with the appeal paper books.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3393/2006

It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate. Respondent Nos.2 and 5 served with notice but not entered appearance.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3394/2006

It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate, Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate. Respondent Nos.2 and 5 served with notice but not entered appearance.

It is lastly submitted that statement of case is not required in this matter.

The appeals alongwith application above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.

DATED THIS THE 08th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

COPY TO:

  1. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv.

  2. Mr. Naresh Kr. Sharma, Adv.

  3. Mr. Anil Nag, Adv.

  4. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv.

  5. Mr. Devender Singh, Advocate

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTON

CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3392, 3393 and 3394/2006

State of H. P. ...Appellant

Versus

Ravinder Kumar Sankhayan & Ors. ...Respondents

OFFICE REPORT

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3392/2006

It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate and Respondent No. 5 is represented by Mr. Naresh Kr. Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 served with notice but not entered appearance.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3393/2006

It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 served with notice but not entered appearance.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3394/2006

It is submitted that there are 5 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 3 is represented by Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Respondent No. 4 is represented by Mr. Anil Nag, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 served with notice but not entered appearance.

It is further submitted that Common Original Record has been received from the High Court and is available with the Registry for reference of this Hon'ble Court.

It is lastly submitted that statement of case is not required in this matter.

The appeals above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.

DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

COPY TO:

    1. Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv.
    1. Mr. Naresh Kr. Sharma, Adv.
    1. Mr. Anil Nag, Adv.

sachin

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

Listed on 11.5.2011 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 1 Item No. 110

SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTON

CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 5338 and 5339/2010

State of NCT of Delhi ...Appellant

Gajendra Haldea & Ors. ...Respondents

Versus

OFFICE REPORT

Service position of each matter is as under:

CIVIL APPEAL No. 5338/2010

It is submitted that there are 6 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Ms. Indu Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are represented by Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are represented by Ms. V.D. Makhija and Mr. Alok Gupta, Advocates respectively. No one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 6 though served with notice.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 5339/2010

It is submitted that there are 6 respondents in this appeal. Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondents. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Advocate. Respondent No. 2 is represented by Mr. Alok Gupta, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are represented by Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Advocate and respondent No. 5 is represented by Mr. P. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate. No one has filed vakalatnama/ appearance on behalf of respondent No. 6.

Common Original Record has been received from the High Court.

It is further submitted that counsel for the parties have not

filed statement of case so far.

..2..

The appeals abovementioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.

DATED THIS THE 10th DAY OF MAY, 2011.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

COPY TO:

    1. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv.
    1. Ms. Indu Sharma, Adv.
    1. Mr. V.D. Makhija, Adv.
    1. Mr. Alok Gupta, Adv.
    1. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.
    1. Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Adv.
    1. Mr. P. Ramesh Kumar, Adv.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.

sachin

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(17) - 28 Mar 2018

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 28 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 15 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 2 May 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 28 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 28 Mar 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 21 Mar 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 15 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 15 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 9 Feb 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(8) - 15 Dec 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Aug 2006

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 14 Jul 2006

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 27 Apr 2006

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 19 Sept 2005

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 19 Sept 2005

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 12 Jul 2005

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 20 Jun 2005

ROP

Click to view