Arvind Singh vs. Steel Authority Of India Limited (Sail)

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sudhanshu Dhulia
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:3 Oct 2023
CNR:SCIN010190682023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed as withdrawn

Listed On:

10 Mar 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.8+36

COURT NO.2

SECTION XVII

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 19068/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-04-2023 in WPS No. 2386/2017 passed by the High Court Of Jharkhand At Ranchi)

ARVIND SINGH & ANR.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED (SAIL) & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

( IA No.194113/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.194115/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING/ CURING THE DEFECTS )

WITH

DIARY NO(S). 19073/2023 ([TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E. Diary No. 19068/2023]........ FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.196324/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.196326/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.197477/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )

Date: 03-10-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, AOR
Mr. Vignesh Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Anand, Adv.
Mr. Rajnish Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Ridhima Singh, Adv.
Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Charanje et kaurMr. Pankaj Singh, Adv.

16.56 Respondent(s)

D.No. 19068/2023 Etc.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to file a review petition before the High Court. If the petitioners are so advised, they may do so.

The special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)