The Assistant Commissioner St vs. Sri Venkateswara Modern Rice Mill

ITEM NO.1703

COURT NO.13

SECTION XII-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 4146/2021

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) (INT) & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S SHIRIDI SAINADH INDUSTRIES & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(Only SLP (C) No. 663-697 of 2022 to be listed. )

WITH

SLP(C) No. 663-697/2022 (XII-A)

Date : 18-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN [IN CHAMBER]

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, AOR Mr. Tushar Giri, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Anil Khanna, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Sandeep Singh, AOR Mr. M.V.J.K. Kumar, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

called, learned counsel for the When the matter was petitioners has handed over a note with the names of newspapers in vernacular language and in English language. The office report on Tault was only that the application for substituted service did $\frac{115500}{\text{Res}}$ mention the names of the newspapers. Now that the learned

$\mathbf{1}$

counsel for the petitioners has handed over the note, let the same be taken on record and let the substituted service be effected through publication in the Hindi, English and vernacular newspaper.

Application for substituted service through newspaper publication is allowed in the above terms.

(KAVITA PAHUJA) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)