M. Jegannadhan vs. Central Excise Rep By The Commissionr Of Central Excise Chennai 1 Union Of India

COURT NO.5

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) Special Leave to Appeal $(C)$ No(s). $\hspace{0.1cm} \texttt{for} \hspace{0.1cm}$ 19808-19809/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2017 in WMP No. 27508/2016 and WMP No. 27509/2016 in Writ Petition No. 11580 of 2006 passed by the High Court Of Madras)

M. JEGANNATHAN

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Respondent(s)

Date : 11-08-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR $CORAM :$ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Subba Rao, AOR Mr. KLDS Vinober, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. K. K. Mani, AOR

Mrs. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Raghunath, Adv. Mr. N.C. Kavitha, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

Issue notice.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

Notice may now be issued to the remaining respondents.

We make it clear that this will not affect the promotions in the High Court.

$\mathbf{1}$

Learned counsel for the petitioner says that respondent Nos. 7 to 52 are proforma respondents and it is not necessary to serve the proforma respondents.

(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR