Vaibhav Sharma vs. State Of H. P.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
27 Jun 2011
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16560/2011
VAIBHAV SHARMA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF H.P.& ORS. Respondent(s)
(With prayer for interim relief and office report )
Date: 09/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Ms.Surbhi Mehta,adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr.Avijit Mani Tripathi,adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv.
Ms.Anukanksha Singh,adv Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey ,Adv
Mr.Viplav Sharma,adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Ld.counsel who offered to appear for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 on the last occasion submits that vakalatnama and counter affidavit is ready and will be filed within a couple of days. Respondent No.3 seeks a few days time for filing counter affidavit as a last chance.
ITEM NO.66 -2-
Contd....2
It is seen that counter affidavit filed by respondent No.4 is defective in relation to Annexure. It is submitted by respondent No.4 that the defect will either be cured or a separate letter/application will be filed in relation to that.
List the matter on 21.11.2011.
(Sunil Thomas)<br>Registrar | ||
---|---|---|
SB<br>ITEM NO.66 | REGISTRAR COURT.2 | SECTION XIV |
S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>I N D I A<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS | ||
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16560/2011 | ||
VAIBHAV SHARMA | Petitioner(s) | |
VERSUS | ||
STATE OF H.P.& ORS. | Respondent(s) | |
(With prayer for interim relief and office report ) | ||
Date: 09/11/2011 | This Petition was called on for hearing today. | |
For Petitioner(s) | Ms.Surbhi Mehta,adv.<br>Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. | |
For Respondent(s) | Mr.Avijit Mani Tripathi,adv.<br>Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. | |
Ms.Anukanksha Singh,adv<br>Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey ,Adv | ||
Mr.Viplav Sharma,adv. | ||
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | ||
Ld.counsel who offered to appear for respondent | ||
Nos.<br>1<br>&<br>2 | on<br>the<br>last<br>occasion | submits<br>that |
vakalatnama and counter affidavit is ready and will be | ||
filed within a couple of days. Respondent No.3 seeks a | ||
few days time for filing counter affidavit as a last | ||
chance. | ||
ITEM NO.66 | -2- | Contd2 |
It is seen that counter affidavit filed by respondent | ||
No.4<br>is<br>defective | in<br>relation<br>to<br>Annexure. | It<br>is |
submitted<br>by | respondent<br>No.4<br>that<br>the | defect<br>will |
either be cured or a separate letter/application will
be filed in relation to that.
List the matter on 21.11.2011.
(Sunil Thomas) Registrar
SB