R. C. Shukla vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh. Secreatary

H Item No.120 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SE CTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 7287/2010 R.C.SHUKLA Appe llant(s) VERSUS STATE OF M.P.& ORS. Resp ondent(s) Date : 10/03/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh,Adv. M/s. Parekh & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. B. S. Banthia,Adv. Ms. Keki Vajpei,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. M. A. Krishna Moorthy,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the appellant and the respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they were notified to do so by letter dated 13.5.2014 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presume d that the appellant Signature Not Verified has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing Digitally signed by Madhu Grover chronology Date: 2015.03.11 15:24:15 IST Reason: of events as filed at the time of pre sentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP )/Appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to file any further statement Item No.120 2 of case. The order further provides that if the respondent who has entered appearance does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be

presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

MG