Amrik Singh vs. Punjab State Through Land Acquisition Collector

ITEM NO.103

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION IV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

Civil Appeal No(s). 6127-6132/2010

KARAM SINGH(D) BY LRS.ETC.ETC.

Appellant(s) $A$

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

WITH

C.A. No. $6134/2010$ (With Office Report)

Date: 25/03/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

M/s. Temple Law Firm, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Ms. C. K. Sucharita, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellants and the Ld.counsel for the respondent have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 29.05.2012 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to eal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to 11:18:45<br>Reasoft Te any further statement of case. The order further provides

$\ldots \ldots 2$

that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB