The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs. Mahesh Udyog
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
3 Jul 2019
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 17259/2019
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-11-2018 in CR No. 224/2018 19-11-2018 in CR No. 225/2018 passed by the High Court Of Himachal Pradesh At Shimla)
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/ DEHAR POWER HOUSE CIRCLE BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD (PW) SLAPPER & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, SUNDERNAGAR/ASSESSING AUTHORITY Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84714/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
WITH
Diary No(s). 18235/2019 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.88580/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Diary No(s). 18237/2019 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89219/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Diary No(s). 18573/2019 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89184/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Diary No(s). 18582/2019 (XIV) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89018/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 03-07-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, AOR |
---|---|
Mr. Shyam Agarwal,Adv. | |
Ms. Sonal Mashankar,Adv. | |
Mr. Abhimanyu Jhamba,Adv. | |
Ms. Hemlata Ranga,Adv. | |
Hatneimawi,Adv. |
Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Aslam,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Ramesh,Adv. Mr. A. Lakshminarayan,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
Issue notice.
Mr. T. Ramesh, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice for the respondent in Diary No.18573/2019, on behalf of Mr. A. Lakshminarayan, Advocate-on-Record.
No coercive steps be taken till the next date of hearing.
Though no reply affidavit is necessary, in case it is so desired it be filed positively within four weeks. If reply affidavit is not filed within the time granted, the matters will be heard without any reply affidavit.
List after four weeks.
(NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER