Rohan Mahto vs. Steel Authority Of India Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. PRADIP Y. LADEKAR
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21461/2023
RAJIV CHANDRA JHA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 188995/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 188996/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
WITH
Diary No(s). 48145/2023 (XVII)
IA No. 267180/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 01-05-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Medhya, Adv. Ms. Jagriti Mittal, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mr. Parth Sarathi, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Vikram Singh, Adv. Ms. Pooja Dhar, AOR
Mr. Pratul Pratap Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajiv Yadav, AOR Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Paramhans Sahani, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
In both the matters numbered above, despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 1 to 4 there is $\mathfrak{p}_{\text{Oit}}$ appearance on their behalf. by Pradip Pradip Yeshwantrao Yeshwantrao Ladekar Ladekar Date: 2024.05.01 $16:54:50 + 0530$
However, Mr. Paramhans Sahani, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr.Rajiv Yadav, Ld. Advocate-on-Record, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. He seeks and is granted four weeks time, to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.
After expiry of said period, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court.
PRADIP Y. LADEKAR Registrar
MG