Rukmini vs. C. Nagaraj
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
² ITEM NO.15 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32827/2010 ABBAL SINGH PANWAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS NATIONAL INS.CO.TR.DIV.MANAGER & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP WITH SLP(C) NO. 32828 of 2010 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 32833 of 2010 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 32835 of 2010 (With office report) Date: 19/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raj Singh Rana,Adv. Ms. Sundri Rawat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C)No.32828/2010 service of notice against respondent No. 6 and 7 is still awaited. The Office report reveals that both the above respondents are minors and are represented through a natural guardian, who is respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 has already been served. Hence, service is deemed as complete against respondent No.6 and 7 through the natural guardian, respondent No.2. No further steps. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court, as per Rule.
...2/-
Item No.15 : 2 :
In all other cases counsel for the respective petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against respondent No.2. List the incomplete matters on 12.12.2012.
| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) | |s | |Registrar |