Parmali (Now Deceased) Through Lrs vs. The State Of Haryana Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble R. Banumathi
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
27 Nov 2017
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).31297-31298/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-02-2017 in RFA No. 4670/2016 28-02-2017 in RFA No. 4792/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
PARMALI (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)
Date : 27-11-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma,Adv. Mr.Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material.
The only point involved in these cases is whether the High Court was correct in granting 12% increase on compensation awarded in Tara Chand's case in determining the quantum of compensation at Rs.1,013/- per square yard or the High Court should have applied a reverse cut in the event, according to the petitioners, the compensation would have
been at Rs.1,062/- per square yard. We decline to go into the said question. The same is, therefore, left to be determined by the High Court in the event the petitioners move the High Court by way of review, etc., if so advised.
The special leave petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
(NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER
(ASHA SONI) BRANCH OFFICER