Kamble Satish Kumar vs. Dr. N. V. Prasad
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.32186-32199/2014
S G JAMALUDHEEN ETC ETC Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS ETC ETC & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 3911-3949/2017 (IV-A) |
---|
S.L.P.(C)CC No. 2880-2918/2017 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 30334/2016 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 32333-32357/2014 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 32427-32452/2014 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 33470-33548/2014 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 2645-2674/2015 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 34490-34493/2014 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 4713-4976/2015 (IV-A) |
SLP(C) No. 1478-1479/2015 (IV-A) |
Date : 11-12-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Deepika Nanda Kumar, Adv. For Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. Nishanth Patil, Adv. Mr. Anup Jain, AOR Mr. Aditya Bhat, Adv. Mr. Gautam Talukdar, AOR Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, AOR Mr. Debasis Misra, AOR Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, AOR Mr. Naveen R. Nath, AOR Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, AOR Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Adv. Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, AOR Mr. Tmy Chacko, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, AOR Digitally signed by RACHNA Date: 2017.12.13 10:52:39 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Mr. R. V. Kameshwaran, AOR
Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, AOR Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No.32186-32199/2014, SLP(C) No.32427-32452/2014
Notice issued to common respondent nos.12 and 15 received back undelivered and notice issued to respondent no.14 received back with the postal remarks "insufficient address". Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars in respect of above-mentioned respondents.
SLP(C) No.32333-32357/2014:
Regisry to issue notice to unserved respondents. In the meanwhile, filing of the spare copies is dispensed with.
SLP(C) No.33470-33548/2014:
Notice issued to respondent nos.3 and 16 received back undelivered and notice issued to respondent no.11 received back with the postal remarks "insufficient address". Notice issued to respondent no.14 received back with the postal remarks "left".
Learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars within four weeks.
SLP(C) No.2645-2674/2015:
Learned counsel for respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time, as a last chance, to file counter affidavit.
Counsel for respondent nos.13 and 14 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity.
Respondent no.9 served but no one has entered appearance
2
on his behalf. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent no.2.
Notice issued to respondent no.6 received back undelivered, respondent no.12 with the postal remarks "insufficient address" and respondent no.15 with the postal remarks "left". Learned counsel for the petitioners is granted four weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of aforesaid respondents.
List the matter again on 08.02.2018.
SLP(C) No.1478-1479/2015:
All respondents are served. Despite opportunities granted, they chose not to file counter affidavit. List the matter before Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C) No.30334/2016 and SLP(C) No.3911-3949/2017:
List the matter before Hon'ble Judge in Chambers as already ordered.
SLP(C) No.34490-34493/2014 and SLP(C) No.4713-4976/2015 and SLP(C) No.2880-2918/2017:
Being fresh matters, list accordingly.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
RR