Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. Through Divisional Town Plannerq vs. Balbir Singh

TTEM NO. $49$

COURT $NO.12$

SECTION TVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Diary No(s). 6601/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 4015 of 2006)

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. (HSIIDC) Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Respondent(s) (Appln. For c/delay in filing SLP)

$WTTH$

• Diary No. 6600/2017
• Diary No. 6934/2017
• Diary No. 6935/2017
• Diary No. 7079/2017
• Diary No. 7080/2017
• Diary No. 7434/2017
• Diary No. 7435/2017
• Diary No. 7439/2017
• Diary No. 8095/2017
• Diary No. 8408/2017
• Diary No. 8410/2017
• Diary No. 8411/2017
• Diary No. 8414/2017

Diary No. 8532/2017

Diary No. 8731/2017

• Diary No. 16584/2017
• Diary No. 16618/2017
• SLP(C No. 16679/2017
• Diary No. 16802/2017
• Diary No. 16871/2017
• Diary No. 17115/2017
• Diary No. 17127/2017
• Diary No. 17231/2017
• Diary No. 17232/2017
• Diary No. 17273/2017
• Diary No. 17275/2017
• Diary No. 17356/2017
• Diary No. 17370/2017

Date : 03-07-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta,ASG Mr. B.K. Satija,AAG Mr. Kanu Agrawal,Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal,Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka,Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Dushynat Dave,Sr.Adv. Mr. Atul Sharma,Adv. Ms. Yamini Khurana,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Agarwal, AOR Mr. Anil Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Mishra,Adv. Mr. Arunima Dwivedi, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Issue notice.

Status quo be maintained with regard to the property in question.

List after disposal of Civil Appeal No. 4835 of 2015.

Pendency of these matters will not debar the respondents from making a representation. The concerned authority is free to consider the same in accordance with law.

However, we do not express any opinion in this regard.

(MADHU BALA) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRA