"In Re : Networking Of Rivers" vs. . . . .
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
18 Sept 2002
Order Text
| h! | W.P(C)No. 512 OF 2002 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITEM No.27 | Court No. 7 | SECTION PIL<br>A/N MATTER | ||
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>I N D I A<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |||
| Writ Petition(Civil) No.512/2002 | ||||
| "IN RE : NETWORKING OF RIVERS" | Petitioner (s) | |||
| ( For further orders )<br>With | ||||
| W.P(C)No.668/2002 | ||||
| Date : 20/01/2003 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. | ||||
| CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Y.K. SABHARWAL<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.K. SEMA | |||
| For the Parties: | Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. (AC) | |||
| Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Adv. (AC) | ||||
| Mr. Sudarsh Menon, Adv.<br>Mr. A. Dev Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Arvind Tiwary, Adv. | ||||
| For Respondent/States:Mr. Sanjary R. Hegde, adv. | ||||
| For Tamil Nadu: | Mr. G. Umapathy, Adv.<br>Mr. Paramasivam, Adv.<br>Mrs.Revathy Raghavan,Adv. | |||
| For U.O.I. | Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Adv.<br>Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. | |||
| Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv.<br>Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,Adv. | ||||
| For Nagaland | Mr. SK. Shandilya, Adv.<br>Mrs V.D. Khanna,Adv. | |||
| For Rajasthan | Mr. Manish Singhvi, Adv.<br>Mr. Ashok K. Mahajan,Adv. | |||
| For NCRPB | Mrs Sheil Mohini Sethi,Adv. | |||
| For Gujara/Mizoram | Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.<br>Ms. Aruna Gupta, Adv. | |||
| For West Bengal | Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv. | |||
| For Goa: | Ms. A. Subhashini, Adv. | |||
| For Chhattisgarh | Mr. Prakash Shrivastava, Adv. |
-2- For U.P.: Mr. Ajay K. Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Alka Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Anamika Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Dorthy Michael, Adv. Mr. C. Siddharth, Adv. For Sikkim: Mr. A. Mariarputham, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Anurag D. Mathur, Adv. For Jharkhand: Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. For Assam: Ms. Krishna Sarma, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. VK. Sidarthan, Adv. for Corporate Law Group For Arunachal Pradesh:Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Adv. Mr. Jyoti Dutt, Adv. For M.P. Mr. BS. Banthia, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. For Manipur Kh. Nobin Singh, Adv. Mr. SS. Shinde, Adv. Mr. VN. Raghupathy, Adv. For Kerala Mr. KR. Sasiprabhu, Adv. Mr. John Mathew, Adv. Ms. K. Sangeeta, Adv. Mr. Sushil Tekdriwal, Adv. For Tripura: Mr. Rajiv Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv. For Meghalaya Mr. RanjanMukherjee, Adv. For Bihar Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. Mr. BB. Singh, Adv. For NCT of Delhi: Mr. DN. Goburdhan, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....J .SP2 W.P.(C)No.512 of 2002@@ CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC It would be expedient if the matter is adjourned by about three months so that the Court is in a position to know as to what progress has been made in the matter. List the matter in the Ist weeks of May, 2003.
-3-
W.P.(C)No.668 of 2002@@ CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC To come up with W.P.(C)No.512 of 2002. (S. Thapar) (V.P. Tyagi)@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA PS. to Registrar Court Master@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order