Deccan Ferro Alloys Ltd vs. A. P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep. By Its Secretary & Ors. Etc, Etc
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble V. Gopala Gowda
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Dec 2014
CNR:SCIN010183852014
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
19 Jun 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
¤ | 1 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEM NO.803<br>SECTION XIIA | COURT NO.6 | |||||||||
I A | S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>I N D | |||||||||
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | ||||||||||
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).31800-31801/2014 | ||||||||||
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/10/2014<br>in WP No. 30753/2014,14/10/2014 in WP No. 30552/2014 passed by the<br>High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) | ||||||||||
M/S GOWTHAMI RAW AND PAR BOILED RICE MILL PEDAGONNURU<br>AND ORS ETC<br>Petitioner(s) | ||||||||||
VERSUS | ||||||||||
A P ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS ETC<br>Respondent(s) | ||||||||||
WITH<br>SLP(C)NO.32016/2014 | ||||||||||
Date : 04/12/2014 These petitions were MENTIONED today. | ||||||||||
CORAM : | ||||||||||
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE | ||||||||||
For Petitioner(s) | ||||||||||
Mr. Ananga Bhattacharyya,Adv. | ||||||||||
Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv.(Mentioned by) | ||||||||||
For Respondent(s) | ||||||||||
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | ||||||||||
It | is | mentioned | by | Mr. | Y. | Raja | Gopa | |||
la | Rao,<br>learned | |||||||||
counsel appearing for the petitioner that notice was ordered in the | ||||||||||
above mentioned SLPs on 1.12.2014.<br>that the | In view of the fact | |||||||||
ere | number<br>are<br>interim | of | connected | matters | are | pending | and | th | ||
orders<br>Signature Not Verified | in<br>the | earlier | matters | not | to | take | any | |||
coercive<br>steps<br>Digitally signed by<br>Om Parkash Sharma<br>Date: 2014.12.05 | ||||||||||
Reason: | against the petitioners for the recovery of the amount in dispute,<br>17:24:51 IST |
the order in these SLPs does not reflect an y such interim
direction. 2
The learned counsel for the petitioner therefore prays that the order dated 1.12.2014 may be corrected by granting the interim order as mentioned above.
In the circumstances, there shall be an interim order in these SLPs, not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners for recovering the amount in dispute, until further orders.
[O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search