Govt. Of Nct Delhi vs. Ombir Singh
AI Summary
In a significant pronouncement, the Supreme Court has allowed appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority and related government entities, overturning previous decisions. This judgment, pertaining to a long-standing land-related dispute, marks a crucial outcome for the involved parties and may have implications for similar cases across the region.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
This Supreme Court order pertains to multiple civil appeals (including 6885/2022, 6886/2022, 6887/2022, 6888/2022) filed by the Delhi Development Authority and the Government of NCT Delhi against various individuals, including Shiv Kumar and Ombir Singh. These appeals challenged a previous order from the Delhi High Court (WP(C)-4760-2016, dated 2018-05-14), likely related to a land dispute. The Supreme Court has, by this order, allowed these appeals, pronouncing a non-reportable judgment.
Timeline of Events
Origin of the dispute, leading to WP(C)-4760-2016 in Delhi High Court.
Delhi High Court passes judgment in WP(C)-4760-2016.
SLP(C) No. 030304 - / 2018 registered (leading to CA 6885/2022).
Civil Appeal No. 6888/2022 filed in Supreme Court.
First hearing date for tagged matters in Supreme Court.
Appeals heard and judgment reserved by the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court pronounces judgment, allowing the appeals.
Key Factual Findings
The appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority and the Government of NCT of Delhi have been allowed by the Supreme Court.
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Secondary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The appellant-side (DDA and Govt. of NCT Delhi) likely argued that the High Court's decision was erroneous and that their land acquisition process was valid and in accordance with the law, seeking to set aside the High Court's order.
Respondent's Arguments
The respondent-side (Shiv Kumar & Ors.) likely contended that the High Court's judgment in their favor was correct and that the appeals filed by the government entities should be dismissed, thereby challenging the legality or fairness of the acquisition.
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.The Appeals are allowed in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment.
- 2.Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Precedential Assessment
Binding (SC)
As a judgment from the Supreme Court, it is binding on all lower courts, and its decision on the merits is final for the involved parties. The 'non-reportable' status generally means it's not designated for official publication, but the legal principles applied remain binding.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble Krishna Murari
Stage:
FOR JUDGEMENT
Remarks:
Appeals(s) allowed
Listed On:
26 Sept 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
(For Judgment) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6885/2022 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS SHIV KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) ([HEARD BY: HON. M.R. SHAH AND HON. KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] ) WITH C.A. No. 6886/2022 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6887/2022 (XIV-A) C.A. No. 6888/2022 (XIV-A) Date : 26-09-2022 These appeals were called on for pronouncement of judgment today. For Parties: Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. C.P. Rajwar, Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Mr. Pushkar Anand, Adv. Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, AOR Mr. Arpit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Prachi Bajpai, AOR Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR Ms. Sunieta Ojha, AOR Ms. Astha Tyagi, AOR Mr. Dinesh Chander Trehan, Adv. Ms. Diksha Narula, Adv. Mr. D.P. Singh Yadav, AOR
ITEM NO.1501 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV-A
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah pronounced the non-reportable judgment of the Bench comprising His Lordship and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari.
****
The Appeals are allowed in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Digitally signed by SNEHA Date: 2022.09.26 15:07:14 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed non-reportable judgment is placed on the file)