State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs. Tariq Ahmad Wani

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (J-Iv)
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Feb 2023
CNR:SCIN010181702021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Stage:

ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)

Remarks:

List before court/bench

Listed On:

25 Jul 2022

In:

Chamber

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8720/2021 STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SYED PARREY & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only SLP(C) No. 4286/2021 to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge-<pre>in-Chamber)</pre> WITH SLP(C) No. 4286/2021 (XVI-A) $(FOR)$ FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 158005/2022 IA No. 158005/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date: 20-02-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH [IN CHAMBERS] Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Firdouse Qutb Wani, AOR Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR

COURT NO.13

SECTION XVI-A

ITEM NO.1703

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The matter has been placed before the Bench on the note that some of the respondents have not been served. The petitioners being State and the respondents being its employees, the Court directs that it shall be the duty of the petitioners to ensure that ature Not Verifie wice is made on all the remaining respondents.

Learned counsel appearing for some of the respondents draw the attention of the Court to order dated 17.09.2021 by which certain interim directions were given.

Learned counsel for the respondents has taken a stand that the same has not been complied with.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order has not been complied with, as there are some issues. The Court would make it absolutely clear that under no circumstances, any order passed by the Court can remain uncomplied with.

Accordingly, let affidavits be filed within four weeks by the Principal Secretaries of the Departments concerned showing compliance, failing which the Court may take Suo Moto notice with regard to non-compliance of the order.

List on 20.03.2023

(ASHIMA CHHABRA) (BEENA JOLLY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(22) - 4 Dec 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 4 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 Jul 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 8 Apr 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 15 May 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 21 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 29 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 20 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 20 Feb 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(13) - 29 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 22 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 25 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 25 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 18 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 18 Jan 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 20 Oct 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 17 Sept 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 6 Sept 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 13 Aug 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 16 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 15 Mar 2021

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Search in District Courts Data