Office Of The Income Tax Officer vs. Gautam Industrial Corporation
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 38144/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-04-2022 in WP No. 43/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1)(3) & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
EQUITABLE FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT. LTD. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.189586/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.189588/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )
WITH Diary No(s). 39016/2022 (IX) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.200192/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 02-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG Mr. Prashant Singh-(II), Adv. Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Mr. Rupinder Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R
Diary No(s). 38144/2022
Issue notice.
Delay condoned.
Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
Tag with SLP (C) No. 20006/2022.
Diary No(s). 39016/2022
Delay condoned.
We are not inclined to issue notice as in the present case the regular assessment order under Section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was passed. We are of the opinion that during the course of assessment the assessee had made full and true disclosure of the material facts, and hence, leaving the question of law open, this special leave petition should be dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(BABITA PANDEY) COURT MASTER (SH)
(R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (NSH)