The State Of Uttar Pradesh Forest Department Through Its Secretary vs. Rahaman Timber Through Its Proprietor Bhoora
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
\214 ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32133/2012 M/S SHIVAM SUPPLIERS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report )) WITH SLP(C) NO. 30185 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 12/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Nikhil Sharma,adv. Ms. Mukti Chowdhary,Adv. Mr.Nishit Agrawal,adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai For Respondent(s) Mr.Prateek Dwivedi,adv. Mr.Adarsh Upadhyay,adv. Mr.Prateek Dewide,adv. Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary,adv. Mr.Vibhav Misra,adv. Ms.Saumya Misra,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C) No.32133/12 service is complete. Respondent seeks time to file counter affidavit.
ITEM NO.60 -2-
In SLP(C) No.30185/12 on last occasion advocate Ms.Pragati Neekhra sought time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of the State respondent. Now on behalf of State Mr.Abhishek Chaudhary seeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. It is submitted by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner that the connected tagged matters are already coming up for hearing in Court. Hence list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. In the meanwhile, all the respondents may file their respective counter affidavit.
| | |(Sunil Thomas) | | | |Registrar |
SB