Shashikala Shriram Badade vs. Cidco Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
6 May 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.17
COURT NO.4
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-02-2024 in PIL No.141/2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
SHASHIKALA SHRIRAM BADADE & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CIDCO LTD. & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.99938/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.99939/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.99937/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))
Date: 06-05-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nishant, AOR | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Adviteeya, Adv. | ||
For Respondent(s) Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Eeshan D. Khaire, Adv. Mr. Lakshay Saini, Adv. Mr. Musharraf Chawdhry, Adv. For M/s Lawyers Knit & Co., Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
- The application for permission to file the Special Leave Petition is allowed.
$\mathbf{2}$ In view of the orders dated 10.04.2024, passed $\mathbf{in}$ $SLP(C)$ No. 6533/2024, and order dated 26.04.2024, passed in Section (C)Nos.9695-9706/2024, whereby the Special Leave Petitions $\ddot{\mathbf{a}}$ rising out of the same impugned judgment have been dismissed, we see no reason to entertain this petition under Article 136 of the Constitution.
3. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 4. As a result, the pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.)
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)