The State Of Madhya Pradesh Chief Secretary vs. Sudhi Ranjan Mohanty

ITEM NO.1762 COURT NO.10 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 6504/2017 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUDHI RANJAN MOHANTY & ANR. Respondent(s) (only W.P.(C) NO. 224 OF 2019 IS TO BE LISTED. ) WITH W.P.(C) No. 224/2019 (PIL-W) (List Office report on default only in WP(C) No. 224 of 2019) Date : 10-09-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Jay Nirupam, Adv. Mr. D Girish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pranav Giri, Adv. Mr. Ekansh Sisodia, Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela, AOR Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Pratima Singh, Adv. Mr. Chanakya Baruah, Adv. Ms. Saloni, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Susheel Tomar, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Gopal Elker, AOR Ms. Charu Ambwani, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

W.P.(C) No. 224/2019

At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner(s), four more weeks time is granted for taking fresh steps in so far as

respondent no. 3 is concerned. Digitally signed by Ashwani Kumar Signature Not Verified

Date: 2024.09.11 17:10:05 IST Reason:

There is no representation on behalf of respondent nos. 2

and 4.

Learned Advocate Mr. Rahul Kaushik is granted four weeks time to file vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 4. In default, Registry is directed to return counter affidavit already filed without vakalatnama.

(NEETA SAPRA) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)