Union Of India The Cabinet Secretary vs. Arcelor Mittal India Limited Through Its Authorized Representative
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
17 Jul 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA
Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 103/2014
U.O.I & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ADHUNIK ALLOYS & POWER LTD & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and stay and office report) WITH T.P.(C) No. 204/2014 (With appln.(s) for stay and appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and Office Report)
T.P.(C) No. 791/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to accept lengthy list of dates and appln.(s) for stay and Office Report)
T.P.(C) No. 952/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and Office Report)
Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Reena Pandey, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Shibhashish Misra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
T.P.(C) No.103/2014
Office report not received. Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.09.30
T.P.(C) No. 204/2014
17:13:37 IST Reason:
Signature Not Verified
Service report from the High Court is received stating
that the Writ Petition (C) No.8725/2012 is not matched with the parties name. Correct Writ Petition(C) No. is 7825/2012 and the same was dismissed as withdrawn. No steps for appropriate correction have yet been taken by the petitioner. However, the Ld. Advocate, Ms. Neha Agarwal has appeared for respondent No.1. Vakalatnama on his behalf is already on record. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.
T.P.(C) No. 791/2014
Opportunity of respondent Nos.1 and 2 to file the counter affidavit has already been declined.
Service of respondent No.3 is complete but none has entered appearance.
Since there are three respondents only, transfer petition stands complete, however, to be listed alongwith the connected petitions.
T.P.(C) No. 952/2014
Among three respondents herein, service upon respondent Nos.1 and 3 is complete but none has entered appearance.
Respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit, despite the warning of last opportunity. Further opportunity stands declined.
This petition also stands complete, however, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the connected petition.
List again on 14.12.2015.