Union Of India The Cabinet Secretary vs. Arcelor Mittal India Limited Through Its Authorized Representative

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Madan B. Lokur
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:28 Sept 2015
CNR:SCIN010178292014

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

17 Jul 2014

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 103/2014

U.O.I & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ADHUNIK ALLOYS & POWER LTD & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and stay and office report) WITH T.P.(C) No. 204/2014 (With appln.(s) for stay and appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and Office Report)

T.P.(C) No. 791/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to accept lengthy list of dates and appln.(s) for stay and Office Report)

T.P.(C) No. 952/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and Office Report)

Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Reena Pandey, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Shibhashish Misra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

T.P.(C) No.103/2014

Office report not received. Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.09.30

T.P.(C) No. 204/2014

17:13:37 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Service report from the High Court is received stating

that the Writ Petition (C) No.8725/2012 is not matched with the parties name. Correct Writ Petition(C) No. is 7825/2012 and the same was dismissed as withdrawn. No steps for appropriate correction have yet been taken by the petitioner. However, the Ld. Advocate, Ms. Neha Agarwal has appeared for respondent No.1. Vakalatnama on his behalf is already on record. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.

T.P.(C) No. 791/2014

Opportunity of respondent Nos.1 and 2 to file the counter affidavit has already been declined.

Service of respondent No.3 is complete but none has entered appearance.

Since there are three respondents only, transfer petition stands complete, however, to be listed alongwith the connected petitions.

T.P.(C) No. 952/2014

Among three respondents herein, service upon respondent Nos.1 and 3 is complete but none has entered appearance.

Respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit, despite the warning of last opportunity. Further opportunity stands declined.

This petition also stands complete, however, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the connected petition.

List again on 14.12.2015.

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(24) - 13 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 13 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 13 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 4 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 6 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 6 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 28 Sept 2015

ROP

Viewing

Order(17) - 28 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 22 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 22 Jul 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 16 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 25 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 28 Jan 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 28 Jan 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 13 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 13 Nov 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 16 Sept 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 16 Sept 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 6 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 11 Jul 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 21 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 10 Mar 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 3 Feb 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view