Mayank Kumar vs. Union Of India

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Vikram Nath, Hima Kohli
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 Sept 2021
CNR:SCIN010177922021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Hima Kohli

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

9 Sept 2021

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.15 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).989/2021

MAYANK KUMAR & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.110184/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) Date : 09-09-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Ms. Padma Priya, Adv. Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Adv. Ms. Shreya Gupta, Adv. Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1 The petitioners seek the extension of the guidelines issued by the Department of Personnel and Training dated 30 September 2009 and the IRS Transfer Policy 2010, besides seeking a direction to the respondents to devise new policies for inter-region transfers of Group 'C' and Group 'B' employees at par with Group 'A' employees. Certain other reliefs have been sought in the petition which has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.

2 The petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy of moving the Central Administrative Tribunal for pursuing their grievances. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the petition under Article 32 on an issue pertaining to the conditions of service.

  • 3 The petition is accordingly dismissed, granting a liberty to the petitioners to pursue their remedies available in law before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
  • 4 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 9 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing
Similar Case Search