New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Chief Executive Officer vs. Anil Kumar Sharma

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (J) - Iv
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:5 Oct 2017
CNR:SCIN010177872017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Listed On:

10 May 2017

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION XI

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18668/2017 <table><tbody>NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYPetitioner(s)</tbody>

VERSUS

RAMESH & ORS.

Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. $18662/2017$

$SLP(C)$ No. 18670/2017

SLP(C) No. $18672/2017$

$SLP(C)$ No. 18665/2017

$SLP(C)$ No. 18666/2017

$SLP(C)$ No. 18674/2017

$SLP(C)$ No. 18667/2017

SLP(C) No. $18673/2017$

$SLP(C)$ No. 18671/2017

SLP(C) No. 18663/2017

$SLP(C)$ No. 18669/2017

$SLP(C)$ No. 18664/2017

Date: 05-10-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ruchit Mittal, Adv. Mr. Kailash Chand, AOR

Respondent(s) Mr. Zulfiker Ali P. S, AOR Mr. T. Ahmad dar, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Ansari, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

SLP(c) No. 18668/2017

Await service of respondent No. 118

Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 5, 11-14, 32-39, 41, 43-46, 48, 49, 64-66, 68-75, 79, 86-89, 102, 104, 107, 115-117 are granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.

Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects in Vakalatnama in respect of respondent Nos. 4, 6, 93.

None appears on behalf of the other respondents.

SLP(c) No.18671/2017

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos. 1-3 to file counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent nos. 4 & 5 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent no. 6, the remarks shows that "insufficient address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18674/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 1 & 3 despite due service. Await service of respondent No. 4.

AS per tracking report, in respect of respondent no. 2, the remarks shows that "wrong address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18662/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 2 & 3 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent no. 1 & 4, the remarks shows that "insufficient address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18672/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 7 & 8 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent nos. 1-6 & 9, the remarks shows that "incomplete address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18673/2017

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos. 1 & 2 to file counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent nos. 3 & 4 despite due service.

Mr. Zulfiker, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2 but no NOC has been filed.

Two weeks' time is granted to file the NOC.

SLP(c) No.18669/2017

Await service of respondent Nos. 195.

Service regarding other respondents is complete.

Mr. Zulfiker, Advocate shall file counter affidavit within four weeks' time for respondent on whose behalf he has filed vakalatnama.

SLP(c) No.18670/2017

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos. 1 & 5 to file counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent nos. 6 to 8 despite due service.

SLP(c) No.18667/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 1, 3 to 5 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent no. 2 the remarks shows that "incomplete address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18666/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 2-4 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent no. 1 the remarks shows that "incomplete address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18665/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 4-6 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent nos. 1-3 the remarks shows that "incomplete address". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18664/2017

None appears for respondent nos. 3 to 5 despite due service.

As per tracking report, in respect of respondent nos. 1 & 2 the remarks shows that "Left India". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for service of notice to him within a period of four weeks.

SLP(c) No.18663/2017

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos. 1-13 to file counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent nos. 14, 15 & 17 despite due service.

Await service of respondent Nos. 16.

List again on 23.11.2017.

SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

ss