Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd vs. Renu Kalra

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION XVII-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ATUL M. KURHEKAR

IA 137775/2022, in Civil Appeal No(s). 7052/2022

GULAB MODI & ANR.

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

M/S IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

IA No. 137775/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

WITH

C.A. No. 8983/2022 (XVII-A) (IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 172934/2022 IA No. 172934/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

C.A. No. 8422/2022 (XVII-A) (IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 172799/2022 IA No. 172799/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Diary No(s). 37142/2022 (XVII-A) ( IA No.185303/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No. 185302/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

Date: 19-01-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR Ms. Ananya Sikri, Adv. Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Goel, AOR Mr. Akshay Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Rohan Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Gaurav Goel, AOR Mr. Akshav Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Rohan Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR Ms. Ananya Sikri, Adv. Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Adv.

Mr. Chritarth Palli , AOR

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

C.A. No. 7052/2022

Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 1.

Respondent no. 3 has already submitted that he does not wish to file counter affidavit.

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent no. 5.

Ld. Counsel for petitioner has furnished fresh particulars for effecting service upon respondent nos. 2 and 4. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to take fresh steps in this regard.

List again on 24.02.2023.

C.A. Nos. 8983/2022 and 8422/2022

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent no. 1. However, Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 1. She seeks and is granted two weeks time to file vakalatnama. One week time, is granted to Ld. Counsel for petitioner to provide pleadings to respondent no. 1. Thereafter, two weeks time, is granted to said respondent to file counter affidavit.

Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve respondent no. 2, as process could not be served with remarks "left".

List again on 24.02.2023.

ATUL M. KURHEKAR Registrar

pm