Jagat Singh vs. The State Of Haryana

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF 2022 (Arising from the SLP(C) Nos.4599-4604/2021)

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

RAMPHAL(DECEASED) THR. HIS LRS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2022 (Arising from the SLP(C)No._______2022) [Diary No. 396 of 2021]

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2022.04.16 12:27:28 IST Reason:

Learned counsel for the appellant-State points out that the issue(s) involved in these appeal(s) already stands answered in Civil Appeal No. 2903 of 2021 and connected cases titled as "Banwari Lal & Anr. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. and connected cases", decided on 14th July, 2021. In that view of the matter, even these appeals stand disposed of on the same terms as applicable to the concerned notification and village where the land Signature Not Verified

in question is situated.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

....................,J. (A.M. KHANWILKAR)

....................,J. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR)

NEW DELHI MARCH 14, 2022. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF 2022 (Arising from the SLP(C) Nos. of 2022) [Diary No(s). 17698/2021]

JAGAT SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Delay in filing special leave petition(s) is condoned on clear understanding that the final relief that will be granted to the appellant(s) would be conditional and no interest would be provided to the concerned appellant(s) for the period of delay of 308 days in filing the special leave petition(s).

Learned counsel for the appellant(s), in all fairness, accepts this condition.

Accordingly, delay is condoned.

Leave granted.

Learned counsel for the appellant(s) has relied on appeals pertaining to the decision of this Court passed in Civil Appeal No. 2903 of 2021 and connected cases titled as "Banwari Lal & Anr. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. and connected cases", decided on 14th July, 2021.

Learned counsel for the respondent/State, in all fairness, submits that the subject lands involved in these appeals would be covered by the enhancement given to the land owners in the aforesaid appeal(s).

Accordingly, the present appeal(s) are disposed of on the same terms, except that appellant(s) will not be entitled for the interest on the enhanced amount and solatium and other components for the period of delay, referred to above in pursuing the appeal(s) before this Court.

The rest of the relied upon order to apply as it is.

This order is an indulgence shown to the appellant(s) regarding condoning "unexplained long delay" in filing the present proceedings.

4

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

....................,J. (A.M. KHANWILKAR)

....................,J. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR)

NEW DELHI

MARCH 14, 2022.

ITEM NO.36 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4599-4604/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-01-2020 in RFA No. 4201/2014 20-01-2020 in RFA No. 631/2016 06-02-2020 in RFA No. 486/2016 17-02-2020 in RFA No. 3645/2019 17-02-2020 in RFA No. 4244/2019 17-02-2020 in RFA No. 4250/2019 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMPHAL(DECEASED) THR. HIS LRS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.40008/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) WITH Diary No(s). 396/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6718/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.6717/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Diary No(s). 17698/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.29023/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.29024/2022-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION) Date : 14-03-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravi Bhushan, AOR Mr. Siddharth Verma (Adv) Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The application for substitution is allowed after condoning the delay. Leave granted.

The appeals are disposed of in terms of signed order.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) [Two signed orders are placed on the file]