Union Of India vs. Mohammed Ali
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
9 May 2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.10+65+67
COURT NO.13
SECTION XVI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.16059/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-02-2024 in WPO No. 2782/2022 passed by the High Court at Calcutta]
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CLASSIC CAREER GUIDANCE PRIVATE LIMITED Respondent $(s)$
FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 109114/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
WITH Diary No. 17682/2025 (XVI)
IA No. 114385/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
Diary No.18597/2025 (XVI) FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 115333/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
With
ITEM NO.65 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.17663/2025
IA No. 120118/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
WITH
ITEM NO.67 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 21127/2025
FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 118198/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
Signature Not verified $\frac{1}{2}$ No(s). 14771/2025 (XVI) 16:34: F<sup>IS</sup>R ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 119301/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
$\mathbf{1}$
IA No. 119300/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS
Date : 09-05-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghavendra P Shankar, A.S.G. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. Karan Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Brijesh Yadav, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. These Special Leave Petitions are covered by the Judgment of this Court rendered on 3-10-2024 in "Union of India & Ors. vs. Rajeev Bansal" (Civil Appeal No.8629/2024 etc.) 2024 (11) Scale 473.
3. In view of the above, the petitions filed by the Revenue are disposed of. The assessee will be governed by reasons discussed in the said Judgment.
4. The assessing officers will dispose of the objections in terms of the law laid down by this Court. Thereafter, the assessee who is/are aggrieved will be at liberty to pursue all the rights and remedies in accordance with law, save and except for the issues which have been concluded in the Judgment.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(CHANDRESH) (POOJA SHARMA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)