Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Heera Gold Exim Private Limited And Ors. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [28-03-2023], List before court/bench [To be listed below Criminal Appeal Nos.761- 762/2021 and connected matter on 28.3.2023.]
Listed On:
31 Jan 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Order Text
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Criminal Appeal Nos.761-762/2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA REPBY SPECIAL OFFICER VANDHANA & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M/S HEERA GOLD EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
W.P.(Crl.) No. 31/2020 (X)
(I.A. No.159905/2022- INTERVENTION APPLICATION I.A. No.189174/2022-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT I.A. No.189188/2022-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS I.A. No.21013/2023-INTERVENTION APPLICATION)
Date : 31-01-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
| For Parties | Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Lakshay Saini, Adv. | Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR | ||||||
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avtar Singh Rawat, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Shah, Adv. Mr. Prashant Andrew Leo, Adv. Mr. Sadashiv, AOR
Mr. K. K. Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Manish Das, Adv. Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Bansal, AOR

Mr. Sanjay Jain, A.S.G. Ms. Sairica Raju, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Gadhe, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv.
Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv.
Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mrs. Swati Ghirdiyal, Adv. Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv. Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ashima Gupta, Adv. Ms. Tanya Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Harshita Sukhija, Adv. Mr. Saroj Kumar Padhy, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv. Mr. K V Girish Chowdary, Adv. Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv. Mr. T Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv. Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Vishal Banshal, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Shankar, Adv. Mr. Niroop Sukrithi, Adv. Mrs. Anjana Prakash, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anuj Prakaash, Adv. Mr. Niraj Dubey, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, AOR Mr. Dushyant Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Tomar, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Shaane Elahi Turkey, Adv. Mr. Jawaid Muzaffar, Adv. Mrs. Shamama Anis, Adv.
Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Adv. Mr. M. R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, AOR Mr. Omkar Jayant Deshpande, Adv. Mrs. Pradnya S Adgaonkar, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, AOR Mr. Avinash Sharma, AOR Mr. Md. Rashid Saeed, AOR Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vaishnavi, Adv. Mr. Ashok Basoya, Adv. Mr. Aakarshan Aditya, AOR Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ranjay Kr. Dubey, AOR Mr. Sadineni Ravi Kumar, AOR Mr. Gaurav Goel, AOR Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, AOR Ms. Aagam Kaur, Adv. Ms. Shreya Saxena, Adv. Ms. Aadya Yadav, Adv. Mr. K. S. Kulkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dewivedi, Adv. Ms. Shweta Sand, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Narendra Pal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, Adv. Mr. Siddharath Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Ms. Kirti Dadheech, Adv. Mr. Mansoor Ali, AOR Ms. Rubina Jawed, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Separate reports have been filed by the applicants in I.A. No.189174/2022 and the petitioner, both seeking to claim a particular view the Revenue Authorities have taken in respect of their land. The fact is, on enquiry, that the demarcation has been done in the absence of either of the parties.
In order to put an end to this dispute, we consider it appropriate to direct that the demarcation will take place in the presence of both the parties and to avoid such a situation in future we also consider it appropriate to fix the date and time when the concerned revenue authorities will begin the demarcation process and submit the consequent report to us. Let the demarcation began on 13.2.2023 onwards supervised by the District Magistrate at 11:00 a.m. If the parties do not participate, it will be presumed that they have nothing to say.
The District Magistrate will make adequate arrangements for providing police force to ensure smooth demarcation.
Learned ASG submits on behalf of SFIO that insofar as the claims filed before the first cut off date, they have been verified but the claims filed after that before the second cut off date are in the process of being verified.
The second part of the process is expected to be over before the next date.
4
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that to the extent of verification done, they have no cavil to the verified claims nor to the Committee sought to be constituted to disburse of the claims thus the only issue is to see the land to be sold to the third parties who will pay the amounts and thus satisfy the claims.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.13 seeks to raise an issue that she has not received the amount as per what the petitioner claims through RTGS process. This aspect may be verified.
List on 28th March, 2023.
(RASHMI DHYANI PANT) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order