Cee Dee Yes Health Care Services Private Ltd vs. Regal Palm Garden Apartment Owners Association
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9510/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-03-2024 in WP No. 29823/2023 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
M/S. CEE DEE YES HEALTH CARE SERVICES PRIVATE LTD. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
REGAL PALM GARDEN APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.99234/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.99235/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 06-05-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Pradeep Kant, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Parijat Kishore, AOR<br>Mr. Beno Bencigar, Adv.<br>Mr. Shubam Kumar, Adv. |
---|---|
Mr. Sumranjeet Singh, Adv. | |
For Respondent(s) Mr. N. Muralikumaran, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. R. Gopinath, Adv. Mr. Hari Krishnan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The argument advanced by learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that the High Court has passed the impugned order on completely incorrect facts. If that be so, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to file review petition on admissible grounds. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the
petitioner to file review petition and with further liberty to come back again to this Court to challenge the main order as also the order to be passed in review, if required.
Pending application(s) shall also stand disposed of.
(NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER