Central Electricity Regulatory Commission vs. Ntpc Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
1 Jul 2009
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
p ITEM NO.110 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6005 OF 2010 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH CENTRAL ELECT.REGULATORY COMMN. Appellant (s) VERSUS NATIONAL HYDROELECT.POWER CORP.LD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay and office report) with CA Nos.6009-6010,7164,6647/2010,3776,5875-5876 and 8712/2011 (with office report) Date: 11/07/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Nikhil Nayyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Himinder Lal,Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra ,Adv Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma ,Adv Ms. Tassy Varghese, Adv. Mr. K.V. Mohan, Adv. Mr. R. Nedumaran, Adv. Mr. B. Balaji, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In CA Nos.6005, 6009-6010, 7164/2010, learned counsel for the appellant is requesting for fresh dasti notice. It is allowed and permitted to be served through standing counsel or through the local Resident Commissioner of the concerned State Authority. Item No.110 -2- So far as CA No.6647/2010 is concerned, appellant and Registry have to verify the status of respondent No.8. Dasti notice is to be issued only if he is not served not otherwise, In rest of the appeals, call for the certificate of service from the concerned Authority. List again on 5.9.2012.
| | | (S.G. SHAH) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | |
rd