The State Of Bihar vs. Nayan Kumar Sinha
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.17
COURT NO.8
SECTION XVI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.17509/2019
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-08-2018 in LPA No.881/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Patna)
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
<pre>Petitioner(s)</pre>VERSUS
NAYAN KUMAR SINHA & ORS.
Respondent(s)
(IA No. 84157/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING; and, IA No.84158/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH
| Diary | No.20845/2019 | (XVI) |
|---|---|---|
| Diary | No.20847/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20848/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20850/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20852/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20856/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20857/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20860/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20879/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20882/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20883/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20885/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20888/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20889/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20891/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20892/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20893/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20894/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20895/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20896/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20898/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20899/2019 | (XVI) |
| Diary | <b>No.20900/2019</b> | (XVI) |
| Diary | No.20901/2019 | (XVI) |
te : 08-07-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. d by<br>MAR $\mathbf{S}^{32} \mathbf{C} \mathbf{S}^{\mathbf{32}} \mathbf{R} \mathbf{A} \mathbf{M} \quad :$
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard Mr. Shivam Singh, learned counsel for the State.
The State shall file an affidavit indicating:
- (a) What was the quantity of paddy procured during the season 2014-2015?;
- (b) At what value was the paddy procured?;
- (c) How much of money was made over to the farmers for such procurement; and
- (d) How much of money "PACS were entitled to for extending their services or by way of commission; and how much of money according to the State is still due to be made over to the PACS"?
List these matters on 29.07.2019.
(MUKESH NASA) (SUMAN JAIN)
COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER