The State Of Uttar Pradesh Department Of Cane Development Sugar Industries Through Secretary vs. Bajaj Hindustan Limited Authorized Signatory Sanjeev Kumar

#ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2008 CC 8500/2008 (From the judgement and order dated 21/04/2008 in CWP No. 7885/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) PRITAM CHAUDHARY & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S BAJAJ HINDUSTAN LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) ( with appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report )) WITH T.P.(C) NO. 614 of 2008 (With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) SLP(C) NO. 15465 of 2008 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 30/06/2008 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv. In CC..8500/08 Mr. Manvendra Verma, Adv. for Pet.1to28 St. of U.P. in Mr. Vilav Sharma, Adv. SLP15465/08 Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Adv. Mr.Garvesh Kabra, Adv. in CC.8500/08 &Mr. Viplav Sharma, Adv. SLP 15465/08 Mr. Ravi P. Mehrotra, Adv. -2- In Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. TP No.614/08 Ms. Sunieta Ojha, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Mr. Ankur Chawla, Adv. Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv. in TP 614/08 Mr. Rahul Pratap, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. For Respondent(s) in SLP....CC.8500/ Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv. 08, SLP15465/08 & Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. ors. Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Abeer Kumar, Adv. Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv. Mr. Alok Agarwal, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala,Adv.

for R6 in SLP... Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. CC.8500/08 &TP614/04 & SLP 15465/08 Mr. Viplav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ravi P. Mehrotra, Adv. St.of U.P. Mr. Garvesh Kabra, Adv. in TP 614/08 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Permission to file SLP is granted in SLP(C)....CC.8500/2008. Let notice issue on the Transfer Petition(C) No.614/2008. Learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Cane Commissioner, U.P., who have been made respondents 2 and 3 in the Transfer Petition, accepts notice. Learned counsel for the U.P. Cane Union Federation Limited, which has been made respondent 4, also accepts notice of the petition. Notice, as far as they are concerned, shall be deemed to have been completed. Let notice issue to the other respondents in the usual course. The notice is made returnable six weeks after the summer vacation. As far as SLP....CC.8500/2008 and SLP(C)No.15465/2008 are concerned, let notice issue on these petitions as well. In SLP....CC.8500/2008 learned counsel appears and accepts notice on behalf of the State of U.P. Similarly, learned counsel appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.8 U.P. Cane -3- Union Federation Ltd. Service of notice as far as they are concerned shall be deemed to have been completed. Let notice issue to the others in the usual course. In SLP(C)No.15465/2008 learned counsel appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 and learned counsel has also appeared and accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.6 U.P. Cane Union Federation Ltd. Notice as far as they are concerned, shall be deemed to have been completed. Notice will only be required to be served on the respondent No.5, Union of India, in the usual course. In Both SLP....CC.8500/2008 and th SLP(C)No.15465/2008 the orders passed on 15 May, 2008 in SLP(C)Nos.10425 -10427 of 2008 shall be applicable until further orders. (Sheetal Dhingra) (Vijay Dhawan)

Court Master Court Master