Satyapal Mittal vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
à6 ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 1367 OF 2012 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S GANESH RICE MILLS & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay and office report ) WITH TP(C) NO.1368/2012 TP(C) NO.1371-1373/2012 TP(C) NO.1377/2012 TP(C) NO.1383-1385/2012 TP(C) NO.1386-1389/2012 TP(C) NO.129-134/2013 TP(C) NO.495-514/2013 TP(C) NO.515-536/2013 TP(C) NO.542-551/2013 Date: 19/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mrs Anil Katiyar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R TP(C) NOS.495-514,515-536,542-551 of 2013 Deleted. -2- Item No.8 TP(C) NO.1367/2012 In all there are 26 respondents out of which respondent No.22 is duly represented. Respondent Nos. 5,11,12 and 19 are yet to be served. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish the fresh and correct address of these respondents within two weeks and on compliance notices be issued through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Remaining respondents though duly served but no one appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.22 is granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. TP(C) NO.1368/2012 In all there are 34 respondents out of which barring respondent No.31, remaining respondents though duly served, none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.31 represented through the ld. Counsel is granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. TP(C) NO.1371/2012 In all there are seven respondents out of which barring respondent Nos. 3, respondent Nos. 4 to 7 though reported to be duly served, none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. However, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are yet to be served. Notices be re issued to them on furnishing their fresh and correct addresses within three weeks and on compliance notices be issued through the concerned District Court in addition to -3- Item No.8 postal service. Respondent No.3 is granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. TP(C) NO.1372/2012 In all there are 13 respondents out of which only respondent No.9 is represented through the ld. Counsel. Three weeks' time is granted as final chance for filing counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 1 to 8 and 10 to 13 are reported to be duly served through the concerned High Court but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. TP(C) NO.1373/2012 In all there are 11 respondents out of which only respondent No.7 is represented through the ld. Counsel. Three weeks' time is granted as final chance for filing counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 1,3 to 6 and 8 to 11 are reported to be duly served but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. Notice be re issued to respondent No.2 on furnishing his fresh and correct address through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. TP(C) NO.1377/2012 In all there are 20 respondents out of which barring respondent no.16 no one has put appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 9, 11,15 and 17 to 20. Respondent No.10 is also reported to be dead. Steps for substitution of legal representatives be taken by next date. Respondent No.16 is granted three weeks' time as final -4- Item No.8 chance for filing counter affidavit. TP(C) NO.1383/2012 In all there are 10 respondents. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 7 to 10 are reported to be duly served but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 4 to 6 on furnishing their fresh and proper address within three weeks and on compliance notices be issued through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. TP(C) NO.1384/2012 Three weeks' time is granted as final chance to respondent no.3 for filing counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 4 to 6 are reported to be duly served through the concerned High Court but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. TP(C) NO.1385,1386 of 2012 In all there are six respondents out of which respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 6 though duly served, none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Respondent No.2 is granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. TP(C) NO.1387/2012 In all there are 12 respondents. Respondent no.8 represented through his ld. Counsel is granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit.
Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 9 to 12 are reported to be duly served through the concerned High Court but no one has -5-
Item No.8 put in appearance on their behalf. TP(C) NO.1388/2012
In all there are eight respondents out of which respondent No.4 represented through his ld. Counsel is granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit.
Remaining respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 8 are reported to be duly served through the concerned High Court but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. TP(C) NO.1389/2012
In all there are nine respondents out of which only respondent No.5 is represented through his counsel. Three weeks' time is granted as final chance for filing counter affidavit.
Remaining respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 to 9 are reported to be duly served through the concerned High Court but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. TP(C) NO.129-134/2013
Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit.
Remaining respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 7 to 17 are reported to be duly served through the concerned High Court but no one has put in appearance on their behalf.
List again on 27.8.2013.
(M.A.SAYEED)<br> | ||
---|---|---|
REGISTRAR<br> |
hj