Dr. R. Rajalakshmi vs. Secretary To Government Health And Family Welfare Department Public Health And Family Welfare Department

TTEM NO. $31$

COURT NO.2

SECTION XII

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.16541-16552/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12246/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12424/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12425/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12583/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12584/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12585/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12382/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12383/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12384/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12385/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 12386/2017 16-06-2017 in WPN No. 13088/2017 passed by the High Court of Madras)

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

VERSUS

DR. PRANEETHA S

(With appln.(s) for impleadment)

WITH S.L.P.(C) No.16621-16624/2017 (With appln.(s) for for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned <pre>judgment)</pre> S.L.P. (C) No.16618/2017 (With appln.(s) for for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned <pre>judgment)</pre> S.L.P.(C) No......./2017 (Diary No.18007/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment) S.L.P.(C) No......./2017 (Diary No.18018/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) S.L.P. (C) No......./2017 (Diary No.18033/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) S.L.P. (C) No......./2017 (Diary No.18109/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment) S.L.P.(C) No......./2017 (Diary No.18171/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment) Signal Set No. 18264/2017 (Diary No. 18264/2017) Demogration to file SLP and exemption from $\frac{2}{12.06} \frac{2}{\text{m}} \frac{1}{\text{m}} \frac{1}{\text{m}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c}} \frac{1}{\text{c$ S.L.P.(C) No......../2017 (Diary No.18356/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment)

S.L.P.(C) No......../2017 (Diary No.18626/2017) (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 06-07-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. C. Manishankar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. T.N. Rajagopalan, Adv. Mr. K. V. Vijayakumar, AOR Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. G. Shankaran, Adv. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv. Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.N. Amarnath, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. Mr. Amit Arora, Adv. M/s. Arputham Aruna And Co. Mr. Arvind Dattar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vinod K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sajeev Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Sethu Mahendran, Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman, AOR Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. A.K. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Bhuwan Jayant, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Rajiv Datta, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.P. Narayanan, Adv.

Mr. Mayilsamy, Adv. Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv.

Mr. G. Anandaselvam, Adv. Mr. Nihangam Maurya, Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, AOR Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jose Abraham, AOR Mr. G. Justin, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Adv. Ms. Vara Gaur, Adv. Ms. Vriti Jindal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Permission to file the special leave petition is granted.

Issue notice, fixing a returnable date within four weeks.

Let the matters be listed in the first week of September, 2017.

As an interim measure, it is directed that the impugned order dated 16th June, 2017, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras shall remain stayed. Needless to say, if any contempt proceedings have been filed on the basis of the said impugned order, the same shall also remain stayed.

(Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master