M. Meenakshi Sundaram vs. S. Manoharan
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble S.V.N. Bhatti
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Adjourned for [D:0,W:8,M:0]
Listed On:
22 Jul 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
174541/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.5
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23543/2022
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 22-09-2021 in WA No. 500/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)
M. MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
S. MANOHARAN & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(IA No. 174541/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 22-07-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
| For Petitioner(s) | Ms. Shobha Ramamoorthy, AOR<br>Mr. Shilp Vinod, Adv.<br>Mr. Gokulakrisnan, Adv.<br>Mr. Ajay Subash, Adv.<br>Ms. Sudharshana B, Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Adv. Mr. N.vijayakumar, Adv. Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. G. Karthikeyan, Adv. Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Adv. Ms. Maitri Goal, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Bhaswati Anukampa, Adv. Mr. Akshat Srivastava, AOR
Mr. Anuj Kapoor, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
$0 R D E R$
Heard Ms. Shobha Ramamoorthy, learned counsel appearing for 1. Signametron Post Post Post Post Post Post Post Post 10.21 ZIS unsel appearing for the respondents.
2. It is submitted that the matter pertains to the payment under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, to the workmen. They also seek compensation under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
3. The matter is adjourned by eight weeks.
4. In the meantime, the money that was received by the receivers and deposited in a Bank along with accrued interest, is permitted to be disbursed to the eligible workmen by the concerned Court. The pendency of this case will not come in the way of such disbursal and the balance claim, if any, will be subject to the outcome of the present proceedings.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR