Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd vs. Suraj Singh& Ors.

ÌITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Transfer Case (Civil) No(s). 78/2015 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURAJ SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions) Date : 16/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.A.Selvin Raja,Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. Mr.Chaitanya Puri,Adv. Ms.Amita Singh Kalkal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is not complete in respect of the respondent Nos.1,2,5,7,8,9,12,13,15,20,21,24,29,33,35,39,40,42 & 44. However, Mr.Chaitanya Puri,Ld.counsel on behalf of Ms.Amita Singh Kalkal Ld.counsel undertakes to appear for all the respondents except respondent No.3. He seeks and is given two week's time to file the vakalatnama. He has stated that he does not intend to file the counter affidavit. This is taken on record. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the copy of pleading to the said respondents within one week after filing the vakalatnama. List again on 16.01.2017. (M V RAMESH)

Registrar

SB