eCourtsIndia

Union Of India vs. Daya Kaur

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble T.S. Thakur
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:7 Jul 2015
CNR:SCIN010170332015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

9 Jun 2015

Order Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 17033 of 2015

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant(s)/

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

DAYA KAUR Respondent(s)

WITH

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 15592 of 2015

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant(s)/

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

BADHO DEVI Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Heard.

There is an inordinate delay of 718 and 417 days respectively in the filing of these applications for leave to appeal for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the petitioners-U.O.I.

The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation.

.......................J (T.S. THAKUR)

.......................J (R. BANUMATHI)

NEW DELHI DATED 7th JULY, 2015. Digitally signed by Mahabir Singh Date: 2015.07.08 15:27:36 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 17033/2015

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

DAYA KAUR Respondent(s)

(With appln. (s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and office report)

WITH C.A. D 15592/2015 (With appln. (s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and office report)

Date: 07/07/2015 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Appellant(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia,ASG Mr. R. Balasubramanian,Adv. Ms. Natasha Vinayak,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard.

There is an inordinate delay of 718 and 417 days respectively in the filing of these applications for leave to appeal for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the petitioners-U.O.I.

The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation.

(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 7 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(2) - 7 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view